PDA

View Full Version : Take a walk on the Live side - the Live Action Movement



EmeraldEdge
09-01-2008, 02:20 AM
So, in the wake of today's industry 101 and talking about people taking the next step from machinima to live action (whether it's shorts or full length features), I thought it would be interesting to start a thread where people could talk about their experiences with it, if they've taken the leap in the past, or those who haven't could ask questions about getting the things they need together and actually making it happen.

I'll give it a start I guess, but will preface it by saying that I am no expert or even a professional of any kind, and don't intend this to be any kind of replacement for the 101 thread, where you can ask someone who really knows, but rather a back and forth with everyone who has or intends to do the deed. I've had the opportunity to be involved in several adventures thus far, in various degrees. The one in which I had the strongest involvement was one that I wrote (but was subsequently stripped and changed until it lost a lot of it's power, I felt). It was called "Repetition". I was also involved in casting, I was the art department, and was supposed to score the film as well. On one feature, I was an extra (in a strip club, Yipee!), and filmed a second unit sequence that was shown on a television in the film, and then basically a whatever was needed of me on another short.

So, let's talk Repetition:

In the course of today's 101, there was talk of how easy it is to get actors, and believe me, it is. When we put out the call (I don't remember all we did, but it wasn't much) we had people showing up from other states, driving down just to audition, and staying over for call backs the next day. I was shocked that there were people willing to do that, at that level. I mean we were first timers just trying to make a go of it. Incidentally, I guess Craig's list has a section for actors and such looking for productions, and I know some who have used it to find gigs. Not saying they were quality films (haven't seen them) but they were acting, and that's the important thing for them, and for the producers looking for people to be in their films.

It was a very interesting process, actually. We had the lead set, as he was friend of a friend who was willing to swing up and take it on, so it was on to find the rest of the roles. We had made our decisions, but oddly enough, there was only one of the actors that we originally cast (outside of the lead) who ended up in the film. The female lead had gone to an actress who bowed out to be in a National Geographic thing (they were paying, we weren't) which is understandable I guess. The lucky part was, we ended up getting a tape from an actress who wanted to take part. She was much better looking and I suspect was a better actress as well, so very lucky indeed on that. So, don't get discouraged if someone has to drop out, something better may be just around the corner. There was another actress that we chose that was arguably the best in the auditions at one role, but when it came to rehearsals, she just couldn't bring it (or so I hear, as I was madly trying to finish the artwork for the production), and she was replaced. The replacement, I felt, wasn't necessarily a step up, but there wasn't much that could be done at that point (as it was the night before the shoot), and I have no idea how bad the other actress was tanking.

So, I had to have drawings and paintings of these women, and the last minute replacement meant I had to spend all night (I got one picture of her at midnight and had to make alterations to existing art to make it work as best I could for the next days shoot). The time given for the art production wasn't enough, in the end, and there were several things that hindered my progress, so in the end it was a bit more spartan than I would have liked.

In the end, I think we had, the Director, and assistant director, DP, script supervisor, four actors, the sound guy, and a grip, as well as myself, and whoever else would show up (mostly to hang out and bring food). Realistically, you could get by with much less, I believe. Personally, I would say that if there is one person you need more than anything else, it would be a decent sound guy, or a way to make sure your sound is tolerable. I can't tell you the number of indie's that I've seen that had bad sound, that ruined an otherwise tolerable effort. Wind spiking the mic when one person is talking, with a train the background, and a nice clear day from the other angle. No effort to make them sound like they were shot at the same time at all. Yuck. If you're just doing it with a few friends, that's one thing, but if you're doing it with the intent of showing it anywhere, I think you owe it to yourself, and the actors, to have presentable sound, where their performances are clear.

We shot in one location over the course of a weekend. In the end, it was a lot of fun, and a lot of anguish (I still have some scars from certain things that happened during the production), and even though there are many things I would have done differently, it was a first step into a larger world. :D

Anyway, I'd really like to hear from people who have taken a walk on the Live side of things and what their experiences have been, what their process was, etc. and if there's anything I can help at all with, I'd be happy chime in with a half (or less) informed answer or two, or recount a tale of 24 hour shoots, in the rain, or whatever.

rogerSIMIAN
09-01-2008, 07:31 AM
I've been messing around with camcorders since the late '80s and my friends and I made little movies over the years which we edited as best we could using a couple of VCRs. We did one weird mock documentary that worked out quite well, called "Son Of Dada", that was inspired by This Is Spinal Tap, David Lynch, Vic Reeves' Big Night Out (a surreal UK comedy show) and the Dadaists. Learned a lot about editing from having to try and get these things knocked together more or less right using inferior technology.

Later, in the mid 1990s I did the majority of a Media Studies diploma and got to do a few days here and there helping out on various video and film shoots.

When I finally got an iMac, around 2000, with the iMovie 2 editing software, it opened up a whole world of possibilities. Digital home video making is so much easier and you can get results that are more or less broadcast standard.

I've used iMovie for making music videos since then and I think it's been great practice at developing my editing skills. The best looking ones were filmed outdoors in summertime. One ("Skullcrusher") was even filmed by our singer and his girlfriend on holiday in Tunisia using puppets she'd made. So, like A_N_D, Jase and Robert Rodriguez say, just use whatever you have to hand that's interesting.

Anyway, I've just uploaded a vid to TMU that shows some stop motion animation my friend Grant and I did in the late '80s using plasticine and the pause button on the camcorder. I speeded it up and edited it together a few years ago in iMovie with some music by a band I used to be in, Crunchy Joseph:

http://www.tmunderground.com/watch/9b4005d41b8a46172e0c/Crunchy-Joseph-plasticine-animation-music-vid

EmeraldEdge
09-02-2008, 03:28 AM
I remember asking my parents for a video camera once, and they shot that down saying we didn't need it (which meant we couldn't afford it). It wasn't until High School when I put together a couple of videos for classes, using a friends video camera (wish he had mentioned it before my senior year) and two vcr's to edit. Good times. I wrote a few plays as well. I actually had an old friend contact me after all these years and the first thing he said was "Hey, remember that play". Made me feel pretty good that my stuff was that memorable. It was so much fun seeing something I had put together on video for the first time. If I had had a camera of my own, I would have continued to do much more, I expect, instead I continued to draw my stories out. I keep intending to buy a camera, but wanted to wait until I had something worthy of shooting.

I'll have to see if I can get a copy of Repetition to put online. In the end it didn't have my score, maybe I'll see if I can put up one with and one without and see which most people prefer, might be a great educational tool for me. I might still have some of the raw files laying around.

EmeraldEdge
09-04-2008, 10:29 AM
Ok, I uploaded it. I put it up as a private movie, as I don't have "permission" to put it up from the director, but it shouldn't be a problem. I think most of you are on my friends list anyway, so you should be able to see it. Hopefully it will encourage folks to get out there and take a chance.

Dulci
09-04-2008, 10:40 AM
Ooo cool. I'll be checking that out when I get home from work.

Uber
09-04-2008, 10:54 AM
I was involved in some intructional videos; CQB, fire team co-ordination, sniper training and such. Not real acting, per say, but on film none the less. Unfortunatly, they are still being used by Dept. Of Defence, SAS office, so they are not for public viewing. I'm trying to get my own copies for my own viewing.

sisch
09-04-2008, 06:00 PM
Ok, I uploaded it. I put it up as a private movie, as I don't have "permission" to put it up from the director, but it shouldn't be a problem. I think most of you are on my friends list anyway, so you should be able to see it. Hopefully it will encourage folks to get out there and take a chance.

Doesn't work, EE - when I look at your profile, it tells me you have 0 videos uploaded....

rogerSIMIAN
09-04-2008, 06:46 PM
Sisch - if you befriend EmeraldEdge you should then be able to find the vid under private videos. Or at least that's how I found it.

Wow, what a creepy little film, EE. In a good way I mean. It's got a good script and it's shot very artistically. The acting's good too.

EmeraldEdge
09-04-2008, 09:59 PM
Sisch - if you befriend EmeraldEdge you should then be able to find the vid under private videos. Or at least that's how I found it.

Wow, what a creepy little film, EE. In a good way I mean. It's got a good script and it's shot very artistically. The acting's good too.
I believe Sisch has been on my friends list since the day I signed up (the day it was announced on TMOA). This is odd. I did just get permission to upload it, so is there a way to change it from private to public, or do I have to re-upload it?


I'm glad you liked it Roger. It actually won the audience favorite at the Eugene Film Festival, and I always chalked it up to the fact that we were the local guys and had the theatre packed with our friends. Personally, I have a hard time watching it, perhaps because I think about what happened with my score, and other things. It's nice to have some feedback though, and if there's any criticism then please feel free to express it. That being said, I hope that it inspires at least a few people to get out and start making real films. It can be done, it doesn't have to be expensive, and overall it's a whole load of fun.

Dulci
09-04-2008, 10:38 PM
I'm not able to watch it either :crying:

EmeraldEdge
09-04-2008, 11:26 PM
Ok, it's back up as a public film, and I just watched the first little bit of it. Let me know if there are any further troubles, and I'll see if there's anything anyone can do. If anyone is interested, i could ask the director to come in and talk about some aspects of what went into getting a short up and going.

sisch
09-05-2008, 01:57 PM
I liked it very much! I thought the acting fine, nice camera shots and effects, plus a good story (though I caught on the twist pretty early, but I like to be right :4:).

What cameras did you use to do that? Anything professional, or something that a "normal" person would be able to afford? Which kind of mic? I thought the sound was done very well (although I noticed that the fight was muted down in some way in relation to the other dialogue).

You shot that over one weekend? Wow!
How long did the preperation take - get the story written, choose the location etc....

Jase180
09-05-2008, 02:49 PM
Nice and tight, well shot in most parts, a great example of short film making..manageable cast, location and subject matter and very very simple to organize and execute. (its not a big set up, a period piece or historical epic, just a single location with a small cast and a plot driven story)

Great production values, and hopefully it helps inspire others to try and make a go.

Dulci
09-05-2008, 03:58 PM
I can't get all technical like Jase, but I do know when something hits me in that oooohhh that was good kind of way, and this did. I'm interested in the same questions Sisch had!

EmeraldEdge
09-06-2008, 05:37 PM
I believe it was a Canon XL2, maybe an XL1, I'm not sure. This was shot before the movies even came out, so it's been a while.

Just like actors, there are people out there who own equipment who are looking to make movies with it. Even people who work for local media companies (local companies that make commercials, and industrial videos). Make friends with some people like that (mingling at local film festivals and the like might help, work as an actor or actress for them, whatever) and you might find that you have a fair amount of equipment available to you (with crew member attached) for a great price (free, or near free). There are tons of people out there looking to do just what you want to do, or be part if it within their particular area of expertise (but everyone wants to be a director). Many have their own equipment, or can get access to equipment.

I'll try and get the director to drop by and give more specific answers about what type of equipment was used.

EmeraldEdge
09-16-2008, 02:51 AM
I thought I'd share with everyone a little something that played at the local film festival a few years back.

Missing Pages

After developing a time machine, Prof. Tanokura finds himself enwrapped in a war ignited by his creation.

Missing Pages (amended version) is an award winning 24 minute short movie shot entirely with a digital still camera. The photos, manipulated using a technique lovingly dubbed "fotomation" delivers a unique visual experience.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w_ru-odUOaY

Clearly they had a bit of a budge, but it certainly gives an idea of thinking outside the box as far as how to make a movie on your own, without a video camera (most people have access to a digital camera and basic photoediting software these days, don't they?).